The Great Big Book Festival Survey 2025 is now live, featuring insights from over 120 UK readers. Read now

Sad Little Men by Richard Beard

Sad Little Men By Richard Beard

"All anglophone private schools exist in the shadow of the institutions that influenced their founding. They replicate the segregation and social exceptionalism reserved for superior beings destined to lead."

Title: Sad Little Men
Author: Richard Beard
Pages:
278
Published by: Harvill Secker (2021)

 

It’s 2021 and the UK government is embroiled in scandal.

Boris Johnson has to front up to parliament and apologise for partygate — a series of parties that took place at the height of the COVID-19 lockdowns — but appears unwilling to do so.

Remarkably, this will not bring his government down. That chapter, featuring a certain ‘Pincher by name, pincher by nature’ will unfold later.

But his bluster, deflection, and obfuscation reveals a naked exceptionalism about men like Johnson that will define his, and many others’, legacies.

This is where Richard Beard’s Sad Little Men picks up, promising an exploration of the origins behind the UK’s political leaders for the past century.

Sad Little Men
An Overview

“At an English boarding school [...] the world they enter is enclosed and has much in common with the asylum at Bethesda, Maryland, where [Erving] Goffman did most of his research”

Sad Little Men makes the case that the culture of boarding schools produces highly flawed individuals. Beard, who attended boarding school at the same time as Boris Johnson and David Cameron, though not at the same institution, chronicles UK private school life throughout the ages, adding his own experiences throughout.

Lacking in empathy — and by extension the necessary qualities for a role in politics — Beard builds a picture of emotional deprivation and strident exceptionalism.

Ultimately, this damage trickles down to the electorate through bad policymaking and toxic rhetoric.

A word on the audiobook version. It’s exceptional, and arguably the best way to experience the book. The narrator, John Sackville, delivers a performance that’s well spoken in the manner of an old Radley College boy, but also quietly vulnerable with trauma leaking into the pronunciation of every word.

Sad little men and the fallout from ‘boarding school syndrome’

Plenty has been written about ‘boarding school syndrome,’ and even more research into attachment theory and its role in separation anxiety.

It’s in this vein that Beard questions how healthy it is to remove a young boy from his family home, to instead be raised by a surrogate parent such as a matron or schoolmaster — especially under the guise of it being ‘good for you’.

And boarding schools as a hotbed of extraordinary social privilege with crippling emotional deprivation, is Beard’s core thesis.

Private schools, declassified

Good old ‘regular’ private schools do not escape Beard’s condemnation either.

He argues that Eton, Winchester, Radley, and Harrow are simply the blueprints of success for every other private school in the land.

These schools exist in their own space and time, Beard argues, retaining many of the cultural and social-economic quirks and antics of previous decades.

On the one-hand, this could be seen as a sweeping generalisation. However, it’s hard to deny the evidence presented. On numerous occasions, Beard consults diary entries of famous alumni, including Orwell and Churchill, and points out the extraordinary similarities in culture across the decades.

These include the glorification of war, the ‘banter’, and the language used. The ‘tuck shop’ features — where young chaps can get their sweets — as does ‘prep’ time after school. 

Any reluctant private school attendee will recognise at least a handful of these.

Conclusion

Sad Little Men is unlikely to change the hearts and minds of the reader who has entrenched views on private schools.

Those who are in favour of private schools may — unkindly in my view — deride the book as a hit job from a disgruntled ‘old boy’. Meanwhile, readers with preconceived notions will likely find their prejudices bolstered by Beard’s book.

That’s not a criticism of Beard’s book, but more a reflection on our own time, where entrenched ‘sides’ and binary opposition thrive in the absence of nuance.

Regardless, Sad Little Men is at its best as an insightful look into the workings of private schools past and present — and a crucial intervention into the public conversation on the UK education system.

Rated 4 out of 5

No One Left to Lie to (by Christopher Hitchens)

No One Left to Lie to Hitchens

“The acquittal of Clinton, and the forgiving by implication of his abuses of public power... has placed future crooked presidents in a strong position."

Title: No One Left to Lie to
Author: Christopher Hitchens
Pages:
338
Published by: Verso (1999)

Bill Clinton is a bad, bad man.

At least, that’s the impression one takes away from No One Left to Lie to.

Reading Hitchens’ account of the Clinton presidency, I’m reminded of the media coverage of President Trump’s impeachment, whose well-documented and heinous crimes against America are perceived to be unprecedented.

And yet reading No One Left to Lie to, Trump’s behaviour and abuse of public office seems, to the contrary, to be wholly precedented.

Clinton may not stand accused of provoking an insurrection, but his use of executive power to salvage personal reputation at the expense of respect to the electorate feels remarkably familiar to a 2020s reader.

Clinton’s Kryptonite

The central premise of No One Left to Lie to is Bill Clinton’s political triangulation and perceived dishonesty in the public eye.

Triangulation is a form of aloof centrism, claiming a tenuous moral high ground without any substantial grounding. It involves borrowing ideas from each political wing – not for the good of the nation, but more cynical reasons around political expediency.

It’s a revisionist take on the Democratic heyday of the 1990s from a journalist and writer who, much like his literary hero George Orwell, possessed that rare quality of eluding the binary boundaries of both the liberal Left and the conservative Right.

Christopher Hitchens defined himself as a leftist and a remnant of the international working class movement. Less swayed by binary political allegiance, Hitchens’ world views were shaped more by an internal moral compass – again, very much like Orwell.

'Hitchens was one of the very few people who could slash and burn you in print, then meet for drinks and talk in the true warmth of friendship, discussing a writer we both admired, garrulous to the very last. It was a sign of his essential decency that he didn’t make it personal.'

For example, Hitchens’ unwavering support for the Iraq War was a flashpoint between him and comrades on the Left, whilst his excoriating critiques of figures like the late Reverend Jerry Falwell drew the ire of the political right.

Of course, this didn’t make him infallible.

Is No One Left to Lie to a Reliable Text?

Hitchens is no stranger to polemical writing that challenges the reputation of seemingly untouchable public figures, such as Henry Kissinger and the late Princess Diana. He even branded Mother Teresa a ‘thieving, fanatical Albanian dwarf

Regardless of one’s views on Hitchens’ polemics, No One Left to Lie To was a bold book to write in 1999, considering the accusations levelled against President Clinton.

Openly accusing Clinton of rape on multiple occasions and including detailed witness accounts, Hitchens dismantles the carefully curated mask fostered by Clinton.

The stronger parts of No One Left to Lie to reside in the chapters dedicated to Clinton’s wielding of foreign policy. Hitchens argues that foreign policy under the Clinton administration was used both as a cudgel to flex US military supremacy and a shield to distract from criticism back home.

And with a number of sources close to the then-President, it’s a damning picture.

“By Tuesday, December 15, after Clinton’s last-ditch nonapology had “bombed” like all its predecessors, every headline had every waverer deciding for impeachment after all. On Wednesday afternoon, the president announced that Saddam Hussein was, shockingly enough, not complying with the UN inspectorate.

And the cruise missiles took wing again. Within hours, the House Republicans had met and, “furious and fractured,” according to the New York Times, had announced the postponement of the impeachment debate, due to begin on Thursday morning.”

The stronger parts of No One Left to Lie to reside in the chapters dedicated to Clinton’s wielding of foreign policy. Hitchens argues that foreign policy under the Clinton administration was used both as a cudgel to flex US military supremacy and a shield to distract from criticism back home.

And with a number of sources close to the then-President, it’s a damning picture.

Final Thoughts

Whilst Hitchens was a great writer and rhetorician, this was not ‘The Hitch’ at the peak of his powers. It’s overly wordy for such a brief text, and his prose lacks the wit and fluidity found in later books such as god is Not Great.

Regardless, No One Left to Lie To remains a powerful contrarian viewpoint and a sensational polemic against a much-loved former US President.

But to get the most out of this book, it’s imperative to leave political biases at the door and judge on the evidence contained within.

A must-read piece of political journalism.

Rated 4 out of 5